Most developers focus their efforts on optimizing for Chromium and sometimes neglect alternatives. The latter is the unfortunate reason why Firefox and Apple's Safari have such a hard time keeping up with Chrome, Edge, Vivaldi, and other Chromium-based browsers. Also, Firefox is your best friend if you root for the open web and want to break free from Chromium's dominance. You might encounter poorly designed websites that do not go well with Firefox, but others launch with no significant issues, albeit sometimes noticeably slower. ![]() Although it is hard to ignore Chrome's consistently better raw performance, superior compatibility, and best-in-class cross-platform capabilities, Google's browser lags behind its competitors in several other aspects.įirefox is a better choice if you are ready to trade performance for privacy. You can get better results when working with "heavy" tabs that consume plenty of memory. Sleeping Tabs in Edge can save about 30-40 MB of RAM per tab, but our testing showed no significant savings after putting nine tabs to sleep. It is worth mentioning that Microsoft Edge has a feature for freezing inactive tabs to reduce RAM consumption. Vivaldi surprised us with the best RAM efficiency: it needed only 960MB of RAM to display all ten tabs. In fact, it consumed 350MB less memory than Edge and 10MB less than Firefox. Again, the results were slightly surprising.Ĭontrary to popular belief, Chrome was not the most RAM-hungry browser. We fired up ten web pages (a YouTube video, stores, large documentation pages, and websites with complex animations) to see how much RAM each browser consumes. The final test we ran was less scientific and more true-to-life. ![]() Chrome finished first with a crushing dominance over its competitors on both systems. On AMD, Firefox beats both Edge and Vivaldi and sits on par when tested on the Intel-based PC. The higher the score, the better your experience when running websites and web apps. The third test measures responsiveness in web applications. On our Intel machine, all Chromium browsers received similar results. This benchmark tests browsers' capabilities to render complex graphics and effects that become more and more popular.Ĭhrome showed the best result, Edge came second, Vivaldi third, and Firefox finished fourth with a notably lower score. Motionmark is another benchmark that shows Chrome's Blink engine's dominance over other engines. However, Firefox performs considerably worse, and its inability to keep up with Chromium may be notable in everyday browsing. In Jetstream 2, all Chromium-based browsers received more or less identical scores. A browser that starts up quickly, executes code faster, and runs smoother gets a higher score. Jetstream 2 is a complex benchmark that measures performance in web apps. With websites getting more complicated and web apps more popular, fast JavaScript performance is the key to a satisfactory experience. Still, raw performance values are a good indicator of how a browser handles demanding tasks. Raw HorsepowerĪn average consumer probably does not care how many points their browser gets in the Jetstream benchmark or similar tests. ![]() Keep in mind that performance on your system might be slightly different depending on how powerful your hardware is. We tested Chrome, Edge, Firefox, and Vivaldi on two systems with AMD and Intel processors.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |